Keyboard Shortcuts?f

×
  • →Next step
  • ←Previous step
  • ↓Skip this slide
  • ↑Previous slide
  • mShow slide thumbnails
  • tShow transcript (+SHIFT = all transcript)
  • nShow notes (+SHIFT = all notes)

Please be cautious in using the transcripts.

They were created mechanically and have mostly not been checked or revised.

Here is how they were created:

  1. live lecture recorded;
  2. machine transcription of live recording;
  3. ask LLM to clean up transcript, and link to individual slides.

This is an error-prone process.

Click here and press the right key for the next slide.

(This may not work on mobile or ipad. You can try using chrome or firefox, but even that may fail. Sorry.)

also ...

Press the left key to go backwards (or swipe right)

Press n to toggle whether notes are shown (or add '?notes' to the url before the #)

Press m or double tap to slide thumbnails (menu)

Press ? at any time to show the keyboard shortcuts

 

Conclusion So Far

conclusion

In conclusion, ...
insert-transcript#e31cdf92-1537-4bb0-ba01-da51a58e8d92-here

Do cultural differences in moral psychology explain political conflict on climate change?

Plan:

Work through Feinberg & Willer (2013) ‘The Moral Roots of Environmental Attitudes’

insert-transcript#1a34b13c-3e1a-407e-aff7-f38e596d9f1d-here

1. ‘Moral convictions and the emotions they evoke shape political attitudes’

2. There are at least two foundational domains of human morality, including harm and purity. Also MFT is true.

3. ‘liberals and conservatives possess different moral profiles’

4. ‘liberals are more likely to view environmental issues in moral terms.’

5. ‘exposing conservatives to proenvironmental appeals based on moral concerns that uniquely resonate with them will lead them to view the environment in moral terms and be more supportive of proenvironmental efforts.’

Well supported
Pluralism well supported, and supported independently of Moral Foundations Theory. But MFT itself seems to have mixed support at this point.